Quick Hits (page 5)Supreme Court Rejects Anti-Marijuana Case - Conant v. WaltersBy: Gina Holland (AP)
Justices turned down the Bush administration's request to consider whether the federal government can punish doctors for recommending or perhaps even talking about the benefits of the drug to sick patients. An appeals court said they cannot. Nine states have laws legalizing marijuana for patients with physician recommendations or prescriptions: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Nevada, Oregon and Washington, and 35 states have passed legislation recognizing marijuana's medicinal value. But federal law bans the use of pot under any circumstances. The case gave the court an opportunity to review its second medical marijuana case in two years. The last one involved cannabis clubs. This one presented a more difficult issue, pitting free-speech rights of doctors against government power to keep physicians from encouraging illegal drug use. A ruling for the administration would have made the state medical marijuana laws unusable. Some California doctors and patients, in filings at the Supreme Court, compared doctor information on pot to physicians' advice on "red wine to reduce the risk of heart disease, Vitamin C, acupuncture, or chicken soup.'' The administration, which has taken a hard stand against the state laws, argued that public heath - not the First Amendment free-speech rights of doctors or patients - was at stake. "The provision of medical advice - whether it be that the patient take aspirin or vitamin C, lose or gain weight, exercise or rest, smoke or refrain from smoking marijuana - is not pure speech. It is the conduct of the practice of medicine. As such, it is subject to reasonable regulation,'' Solicitor General Theodore Olson said in court papers. Some people had expected the Supreme Court to step into the case, which comes from California, the battleground over the subject. Keith Vines, a prosecutor in San Francisco who used marijuana to overcome HIV-related illnesses, was among those who challenged a policy, put in place during the Clinton administration. That policy requires the revocation of federal prescription licenses of doctors who recommend marijuana. "If the government is zipping them up, and we're not being told about options, that's negligence,'' Vines said. Policy supporters contend that the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration must be allowed to protect the public. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that physicians should be able to speak candidly with patients without fear of government sanctions, but they can be punished if they actually help patients obtain the drug. Doctors fear losing their prescription-writing powers, which would put them out of business. "It's taking the culture war issue of the moment and using it in a way that could undermine the First Amendment, medical profession, and patients' well-being,'' said Graham Boyd, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney representing patients, doctors, and other groups. |
Growin' Our Own (page 5)There's a Word for Some People Who try to Assist the Sick: FelonBy: Staff Reporter, L.A. Times
Through Judge A. Howard Matz's courtroom have come cases of prostitution, bribery, Rampart lies, stolen dope, crooked lawmen and a lawsuit over Britney Spears and roller skates. Many words have been used to describe the felons who have stood where defendant Scott Imler stood, but the words I heard weren't words I'm used to hearing about a criminal -- and especially not from the judge who was about to sentence him. "There's a word called 'mensch' that applies to who you are," Matz told him. "A truly admirable personality." As I said, I had to keep telling myself -- this is a sentencing, not a Scott Imler Day ceremony. Imler is the father, the co-author, of Proposition 215, the measure that legalized the medical use of marijuana. Eight other states have such laws, and all of them are in conflict with federal law, which absurdly puts marijuana right up there with heroin and crack as a Schedule I drug -- as dangerous as they come. If you want some comparison, try this: morphine, methamphetamine -- speed -- and OxyContin, said to be Rush Limbaugh's narcotic siren, are only rated Schedule II. With the blessing of the city of West Hollywood and Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca, Imler ran the Los Angeles Cannabis Resource Center. It was a tight ship -- none of this scribbling of doctors' recommendations on cocktail napkins. Patients had to have legit letters from real doctors, and renew them regularly. There was a 24-hour hotline for cops who wanted to check whether they'd nabbed a recreational toker or a cancer patient. There were photo IDs of the CRC's patients, who numbered nearly a thousand. Some of them were in court for the sentencing, cramming the benches along with clergymen in notched collars. The CRC was a textbook how-to case for Proposition 215, and yet in October 2001, a month after the Sept. 11 attacks, the Drug Enforcement Administration busted the club, and arrested Imler and two colleagues for violating federal law. With the threat of being charged as a racketeer and a dope dealer and maybe worse, Imler and the center's vice president and treasurer, Jeffrey Farrington and Jeffrey Yablan, pleaded guilty to maintaining a drug establishment, and hoped that the judge would be more thoughtful than the DEA. He was. Matz paged through letter after letter that heaped praise upon praise for the guilty man and his two colleagues. A mayor wrote one. Two state senators. A Methodist leader. Imler's attorney, Ronald Kaye, spoke with a quaver in his voice about the "honor" of representing such a man. "I'm not going to say I've never gotten letters as important as these," Matz said, "but I've never gotten letters more important than these." The words the judge had for the DEA, albeit carefully parsed within the iron palings of federal law, were stinging. "I think this entire prosecution was badly misguided. Given the huge scope of federal jurisdiction and the great prevalence of crime in our community," this case "baffles me, disturbs me, but that's [the DEA's] prerogative...." Matz gave each man the most lowball sentence he could -- a year's probation, and community service. He'd tried to sentence Imler to six months' probation, but the fellow from the federal probation department stood up in the front row and told the judge quietly that yes, your honor, it has to be a year minimum. So a year it was. Imler will undergo surgery at the City of Hope for lung cancer. The prosecution suggested that his condition could be dealt with in federal prison, but Matz swatted that down: "For someone to say this is not an extraordinary impairment suggests to me that person has had no experience with cancer -- not as patient, a friend, a caregiver, or in any human way." Two things are running headlong into each other here, and people like Scott Imler are not the only ones being caught in the collision. All of us are getting it in the shorts. The first is states' rights versus federal law. The Bush administration seems to like states' rights well enough when it agrees with them -- like Big Daddy laws requiring women to put in 24 hours of "reflection" before getting an abortion, or revving up coastal oil drilling off California despite 30 years of unmistakable public ferocity on the subject. The administration jumped into bed with oil companies and engine makers to block cleaner fuel conversion rules in Southern California, saying we can't make laws stricter than federal ones. [Fine -- if they'll breathe our air, I'll live by their rules.] Arnold Schwarzenegger and Dianne Feinstein just faced down the feds so California can go ahead with its stricter rules for gunk-spewing small engines like the ones on lawnmowers and boats. And when it comes to ranking marijuana as more dangerous than morphine, never mind that the government contradicts itself -- Matz cited a study commissioned by the White House that "cautiously endorsed the medical use of marijuana." Obviously the DEA doesn't have copies of the report lying around in its coffee-break rooms. Which brings up the other head-on collision: that great oxymoron, political science -- what happens when politicians make their own science. The world's experts are virtually unanimous that global warming is real and a threat -- but Congress and the Bush administration don't believe in it, so they won't fight what they don't believe exists. The pesticide DDT has caused untold damage to the natural world, and its ban has helped make amends, but House Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas, a former exterminator, has said it's not harmful, and even wanted to make it legal again. The Bush administration has been accused of playing fast and loose with information on government Web sites about breast cancer and abortion, to suit its anti-abortion agenda. And there was the North Carolina lawmaker and amateur ob-gyn who argued that women who are raped can't get pregnant. "The facts are that people who are raped -- who are truly raped -- the juices don't flow, the body functions don't work." (He said that in the last half-dozen years of the 20th century, by the way.) And of course in the same decade of the same century, the Kansas Board of Education banned the teaching of evolution, the age of the Earth, the Big Bang and plate tectonics. It reversed itself about two years ago, thus perhaps proving that human brains do evolve, after all. I spent some time with Scott Imler at his cannabis club a few years ago, when Proposition 215 was in the wind. I went there as a columnist, not as a client, although I could have -- I'd had undiagnosed glaucoma since I was a teenager, and by the time they caught it, no drops or pills could keep it in check, and in the few weeks before my surgery, my doctor told me to smoke marijuana every day. It was like working in an ice cream store -- sounds like a dream come true at first, but pretty soon, and I mean soon, you can't stand the stuff. Steven Jay Gould, the Harvard paleobiologist, smoked marijuana to keep down the nausea from chemotherapy. Lyn Nofziger, the World War II veteran and first-string Reagan loyalist, supported medical marijuana, after it was the only thing that relieved his daughter's pain from cancer. Bill Lockyer, the state attorney general, came out in support of medical marijuana after his mother and sister died of leukemia, and it "seemed odd" to him that "a doctor could give them morphine but couldn't give them marijuana." Behind me in court yesterday, a couple of men were whispering. They were hoping that Arnold -- Gov. Schwarzenegger -- will "come down on our side of this. We know he's tried the recreational kind." Schwarzenegger versus the DEA -- now that I'd pay Saturday-night movie ticket prices to see. |
Pipeline (page 5)California U.S. Senate candidate James Gray: "This time, it matters"By: Libertarian Party
"Every single vote I get will legitimately be seen in favor of repealing drug prohibition," he said in his campaign announcement at the Old Courthouse Building in Santa Ana on November 19. "I want to make this clear: If we focus our campaign on the Drug War, people who agree with us will not worry about 'throwing away their vote' on a third-party candidate. Our campaign will convince them, because of our anti-war stand, that every vote will rightfully be seen as a vote to end the Drug War." Gray, 58, said his campaign slogan will be: "This time, it matters." If he wins the party's nomination at the California LP state convention in March 2004, Gray would take on Democrat Barbara Boxer in the general election. Gray was introduced at his campaign announcement by syndicated radio talk show host and television personality Larry Elder. Gray said he hopes to win up to 15% of the vote, which would be enough to help redefine the debate about drug laws. "If we capture only a third of the votes of people who favor drug reform...that would be enough to make us a political force to be reckoned with and to put the drug war into the nation's political debate," he previously wrote in an article in Liberty magazine. Gray has taken a leave of absence from his judge's position for the duration of the campaign. He said he plans to devote 100% of his time to his bid for U.S. Senate. California Libertarians praised Gray's decision to run. California LP State Chair Aaron Starr said, "We're very excited about Gray's prospects, especially when it comes to reaching out to his fellow elected officials." California LP Southern Vice Chair Mark Selzer told the Los Angeles Times, "He brings with him the gravitas of his position. He's going to take our party to the next level in terms of the respect people have for us." After a lifetime as a Republican, Gray became a dues-paying member of the Libertarian Party in February 2003. In an article in Liberty magazine, Gray said he joined the LP because he "realized that the major parties will never begin the process of ending the War on Drugs. The Republican and Democratic parties are invested in the drug war, committed to it. "It takes another party to do that -- one that holds dear the principles of liberty. The Libertarian Party is my natural home. And it is the Libertarian Party's historic mission to begin the peace process in the War on Drugs." Gray is the author of Why Our Drug Laws Have Failed and What We Can Do About It: A Judicial Indictment of the War on Drugs. Published in April 2001 by Temple University Press, the book expounds on Gray's premise that "drug policy reform [is] the most important issue facing this great country, and our so-called War on Drugs [is] our biggest failure." In the book, Gray argues that the War on Drugs has not reduced the amount of illegal drugs available in the country; that it has eroded Americans' civil liberties; and that it makes drugs more dangerous. As a solution, he advocated "realistic" education about the dangers of drugs, mandatory drug treatment, needle exchange programs, drug decriminalization, and the regulated sale of drugs. Gray has already announced a series of campaign activities over the next several months. In January, for example, he is slated to give a speech at Santa Clara University (January 15); speak to the Shasta County LP in Redding (January 18); hold a press conference at a medical marijuana clinic in Fairfax (January 19); and speak to the Carmel Valley Rotary Club (January 20). Gray will also do an interview on the Karen Grant Radio Show on KION AM (January 23); speak to a meeting of the Monterey County LP and FED-UP in Monterey (January 23); address a conference in Santa Cruz (January 24); and speak to the Sonoma County LP in Santa Rosa (January 25). Longtime Libertarian activist Gail Lightfoot is also seeking the LP's nomination for U.S. Senate. Lightfoot is a registered nurse and the Chair of the San Luis Obispo LP. She was the 2002 LP candidate for California Secretary of State, winning 204,527 votes (2.82%). Gray was appointed to the Orange County Superior Court by Governor George Deukmejian in 1983, and was re-elected in 1990, 1996, and 2002. Previously, he had served as a judge on the Santa Ana Municipal Court. He was the winner of the "Judge of the Year" award in 1992 from the Business Litigation Section of the Orange County Bar Association. In 1998, Gray was a candidate for U.S. House in the Republican primary, losing to former Congressman Robert Dornan. Outside of court, Gray has worked with the "Stay In School" program; is a co-founder of BLAST (Bert Bylevens Leagues, After School Time) which offers after-school athletic programs for children; and is a co-founder of the Association of Former U.S. Attorneys. A U.S. Navy veteran, Gray also served in the Peace Corps in Costa Rica for two years and worked as an adjunct professor at Chapman University. He received an undergraduate degree from UCLA in 1966 and a Juris Doctor from the University of Southern California in 1971. For information, visit: www.judgejimgray.com. Dakota Joseph Arts KeNa Productions. For all your website needs. Emphasizing fast load times, usability, browser compatibility, standards compliance and high quality graphics. The Whipping Post. Not for the politically correct. Riveting commentary to engage, enrage, enlighten and inflame. |
| Disclaimer | Privacy policy | Home © 2002 - 2003 Bud Life. All rights reserved. |